Why the First Step Out of the Matrix Might Be Getting Rid of Your Tie.

By Anubhav Srivastava

I have a theory.

It is not a grand theory of everything like in my book, Nothing/Everything: The Mind Bending Philosophical Theory of Everything. It is not a grand theory of consciousness discussed in my other works, the Alien Mind and the forthcoming Eternal Continuity Project.

It is a small, practical, almost absurdly specific theory about a piece of fabric that men wrap around their necks. But I think it is true.

The theory is this: Men who wear ties on a daily basis are fundamentally more conforming to the system than men who do not.

And the corollary is this: The first step to getting rid of the Matrix, for a man, might be to get rid of the tie.

Let me explain.

The necktie, as we know it, originated in the 17th century. Croatian mercenaries fighting in the Thirty Years’ War wore a cloth around their necks as part of their uniform. The French, ever the trendsetters, adopted it. They called it “la cravate,” from “Hrvat” — the Croatian word for “Croat.”

By the 19th century, it had become a standard part of the “uniform of the gentleman.” It signaled class, education, and respectability. A man who wore a tie was a man who could be trusted. A man who did not wear a tie was a tradesman, a laborer, or a rogue.

By the 20th century, the tie had become the Uniform of the Corporate Man. The “Organization Man” of the 1950s wore a tie to signal that he was a team player. The “Masters of the Universe” of the 1980s wore expensive ties to signal their status within the hierarchy.

But here is the critical detail that no one talks about:

The tie serves no practical function. It does not keep you warm. It does not protect you from the elements. It does not hold your pants up. It does not cover a vital organ. It is, purely and simply, a Symbol.

And the symbolism is precisely this: Submission to the Code. The tie is supposed to be slightly uncomfortable. That discomfort reminds you that you are in a role, not in your natural state. It is the physical manifestation of the social contract: “You will give up a small measure of your freedom, and in return, you will be accepted by the tribe.”

I was first taught to wear a tie in school. It was not optional. It was the uniform. Every day, from the age of six, I would stand in front of a mirror and knot a piece of fabric around my neck before walking out the door. I did not question it. No one questioned it. It was simply what “good boys” did.

Think about what that training does to a young mind. You are teaching a child that in order to be accepted, in order to be “professional,” in order to be a “good boy,” you must constrict your own throat. You must make yourself slightly uncomfortable. You must signal, before you have said a single word, that you are willing to comply with the rules of the system.

This is Behavioral Conditioning. The tie is the first leash many men learn to wear. And they wear it for the rest of their lives, long after the school uniform has been replaced by the corporate armor, without ever asking: “Why am I still wearing this? Who decided this was necessary? What am I signaling by keeping this knot around my neck?”

I wore the tie throughout my early career. I wore it to interviews I conducted for the movie Carve Your Destiny. I wore it to business meetings. I wore it to motivational speaking engagements. I wore it to conferences where I was supposed to be the “expert.” I wore it because that was what “professionals” did. It was the uniform of the “Success Santa Claus” — the man who had the answers, the man who could be trusted, the man who played the game by the rules.

And I was good at playing that game. I climbed the ladder. I built the practice. I made the money. But there was always a part of me that, at the end of the day, would loosen the knot and take a deep breath. The first breath of the evening. The breath that said: “The performance is over. I can be myself now.”

Write on Medium
I did not realize, at the time, that the tie was the symbol of the performance. I thought it was just “what you wore.” I thought it was neutral. I thought it was professional.

I was wrong.

I still wear blazers. I still wear formal trousers. I still dress well when I want to. But I largely stopped wearing the tie. And the difference was immediate. My throat felt free. My chest felt open. I could breathe in a way I had not breathed since I was a child, before the school uniform, before the corporate armor, before the knot became a daily ritual.

There is a reason the tie goes around the throat. The throat is where the voice lives. It is where breath becomes sound, where thought becomes speech, where the inner world meets the outer world.

When you constrict the throat, you constrict the voice. Not literally — you can still speak with a tie on. But symbolically, you are signaling: “I will not speak out of turn. I will not say anything that makes the system uncomfortable. I will be a good boy.”

I stopped wearing the tie. And I found my voice. Not because the tie was magically silencing me. But because the ritual of putting it on every morning was a ritual of Compliance. It was a daily reaffirmation of the social contract. It was a reminder that I was playing a role, and the role had rules.

When I stopped the ritual, I broke the contract. I started writing Nothing/Everything. I started building an AI Ecosystem. I started telling the truth about the “Success Santa Claus,” about the “BS World,” about the Chunky Monkeys. I started speaking like a man who had cut the leash.

I still wear a tie on special occasions. When I want to. When it feels like the right choice for the moment. But I never wear it out of obligation. I never wear it because “that’s what good boys do.” I wear it because I choose to, and the moment the occasion is over, it comes off.

The difference between wearing a tie because you have to and wearing a tie because you choose to is the difference between being a prisoner and being a free man. Both men are wearing the same garment. But one is bound by it, and the other is not.

I am not saying that every man who wears a tie is a conformist. I am not saying that every man who does not wear a tie is a revolutionary. We must distinguish between the Prisoner and the Infiltrator.

If we say “free spirits don’t wear ties,” we risk validating the modern tech-bro culture. Look at the “efficiency bros” wearing gray t-shirts every day. Are they free spirits? No. They have simply traded the Wall Street Matrix for the Silicon Valley Matrix. Their “casual” wear is just a different, more insidious uniform of conformity. They are still “Chunky the Monkey,” just eating a different brand of banana. Rejecting the tie does not automatically grant you sovereignty.

There is a massive psychological difference between wearing a tie because you have to, and wearing a tie because you choose to.

The Middle Manager (The Prisoner): Wears the tie to avoid being punished by HR. The tie wears him.

The Sovereign (The Infiltrator): Wears the bespoke suit and the silk tie to a specific meeting because he understands the psychology of the “Chunkies” across the table. He knows that wearing the uniform of the Matrix lowers their defenses. He is using the tie not as a leash, but as camouflage.

A dog wears a collar because its master commands it. The dog is owned. A spy wears the uniform of the enemy general to walk past the guards and steal the treasury. The spy is sovereign.

So the thesis should be:
“The degree to which a man conforms to the system is directly proportional to his inability to take his tie off on a Tuesday. The truly sovereign individual — the street-smart operator — views all clothing as tactical armor. He may wear a t-shirt to a boardroom to because he just doesn’t care, or he may wear a perfectly knotted tie to a negotiation to execute a flawless infiltration. But he never, ever wears the tie just to be a ‘good boy’.”

If you are a man who wears a tie every day, ask yourself: “Why? Is this my choice, or am I wearing it because I am afraid of what will happen if I stop?” If you are a man who wears a tie only on special occasions, ask yourself: “Do I feel the difference? Do I feel the shift in my posture, my voice, my sense of self when I put it on and when I take it off?”

The garment itself is neutral. It is a piece of fabric. But the Ritual of wearing it — the daily, unquestioned submission to a dress code that has no practical purpose — is a window into the soul.

The first step out of the Matrix might be as simple as loosening the knot.

The throat is meant to be free. The voice is meant to be heard. And the man who has cut the leash — who wears the tie only when he chooses, and never out of obligation — has taken the first step towards a freedom the Chunky Monkey will never understand.

A Segment from my forthcoming book: Visaless Tourists of the Zeromniverse.